Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

PLSI 3463: Masters of Suspicion

This is a guide to point you to the resources for your final paper. Your annotated bibliography will require at least ten sources - five primary and five secondary.

Assignment Description

From Dr. Peter O'Brien's assignment description, with emphasis added for what research will be required:

Write an extended essay (~4000 words) that explores, examines and assesses the philosophy of one of the authors listed on the syllabus for PLSI 3463. Your investigation must involve: 1) consideration of no fewer than four primary works by the elected author in addition to the one assigned in the syllabus; 2) consideration of no fewer than five secondary reviews, critiques, explications of “your” philosopher’s work by other writers; 3) clear discussion of how your primary and secondary sources relate to the central theme of PLSI 3463 [i.e., the (un)desirability/(in)feasibility of liberal democracy]; 4) an explanation of how and why you agree and/or disagree with “your” philosopher’s position regarding that central theme.